|
| |
| |
The Industrial and
Social Impact of John Wilkinson -
conference paper below |
|
| |
John Wilkinson (1728-1808) |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
Broseley
Ironmaster, Inventor and Entrepreneur Countrywide.
Born
July 14th 1728 in Clifton, Cumbria, son of Isaac Wilkinson.
Died
July 14th 1808 in Bradley, Staffordshire.
|
|
| |
Major
achievements:
·
Many
improvements in the production of iron.
·
Use of
sound castings for cannon manufacture
·
Accurate
boring machine for cannon
·
Method
for making spiral drive grooves (rifling) to improve accuracy of cannon fire
·
Method
for producing accurate, truly circular cylinders for steam engines
·
Major
instigator of the use of cast iron for the Bridge at Coalbrookdale
·
Promoted
use of iron for barge manufacture
·
Promoted
use of railways for carrying his products down to the River Severn
·
Major
investor in copper mining and refining
·
Investor
in other industries including production of lead and chemicals
|
|
| |
(Click
the links to get to the references,
then click the reference link to get back to the text.) |
|
| |
A Few Website Articles of interest:
King of the
Ironmasters
New Willey
John
Wilkinson - Copper King?
http://www.broseley.org.uk/wilkfiles/Wilkinson%20tokens.htm
http://www.broseley.org.uk/wilkfiles/us.htm
http://www.broseley.org.uk/bibliogr.htm#Iron%20Industry
http://www.wrexham.gov.uk/english/heritage/famous_people/john_wilkinson.htm
http://www.bahs.org.uk/05n1a4.pdf
http://www.henrycort.net/ficumbria.htm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/northeast/guides/halloffame/innovators/john_wilkinson.shtml
http://www.oakengates.com/history/john_wilkinson_and_the_snedshill.htm
|
|
| |
Footprints of Industry Conference 3rd-6th
June 2009 Session 3, Britain as an Industrial Society
The
Industrial and Social Impact of John Wilkinson
Eur Ing Vin Callcut, C Eng, FIM3
John Wilkinson is recognised as an ironmaster of ability, acumen and
energy. Accepting technical challenges, his production methodology was
evolved to build an enviable reputation for product quality. He could price
his products accordingly. Starting with little capital, he developed
business and communication skills that enabled him to convince backers to
support his ironmaking enterprises.
He found areas where ironmaking
opportunities were apparent and expanded his interests by either takeover or
new building. After establishing a sufficiently prosperous share of
Britain’s growing ironmaking industry, he expanded into other industries
where his expertise and capital would be useful. The copper industry was
one that benefitted from his help and also used considerable tonnage of iron
in infrastructure and production. The manufacture of lead pipes and
chemicals were also of significance. Transport of raw materials, fuels and
finished goods on land and by water was vital to his businesses. If
profitability became impaired, he could choose to sell out of some
businesses and move his capital elsewhere.
In each major area of interest he
established a domestic base. His various domestic and agricultural projects
made significant differences to local areas.
The paper will examine the way in which
the impact of one ironmaster can be assessed. This will include the
establishment of business systems and human resources together with the
chronology of acquisitions as a majority or minor shareholder and associated
projects. His interactions with colleagues will be discussed regarding
their common objectives. This will help towards a summary of perceived
benefits to the British economy and society. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The call for papers for this conference
sets out an interesting challenge in calling for an assessment of the impact
of the Industrial Revolution on the modern world. Many papers and
books have been written establishing the achievements of the leaders of the
industrial enlightenment that stimulated the prosperity of the nation.
To assess the long term impact means that for each activity the personal and
financial benefits would need to be quantified. The individual items
would then be adjusted for inflation and totalled to give an overall figure
comparable with current money values. In the absence of full records
of employees, orders and sales figures, the results have to depend on best
estimates.
Many of the published articles and books
that refer to John Wilkinson and have been used and acknowledged. The
use of any quotation does not imply that it has been verified. The
survey of interests cannot be comprehensive; for simplicity and brevity, it
omits references to exports, overseas interests and most adversities.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
John Wilkinson’s family hailed from the
English/Scottish border region where life had never been easy and feelings
often ran high. Family loyalties were very strong. This background might
have influenced his business policies and his probable charming Cumbrian
accent would have helped establish his apparent neutrality in negotiations
in Southern England. His surname is listed as one of the border reiver
families operating during the 16th and 17th centuries
who had their own ways of re-distributing wealth. It is an Anglicised form
of the Scots surname ‘McQuillan’.
Wilkinson, like Winston Churchill and
many other great leaders, did not need much sleep. Time spent asleep was
time wasted. He preferred to lie, relax and think usefully. He rested
holding in his hand a steel ball, poised over a copper bowl. If he dropped
off there was a clang of metal on metal that swiftly brought him back to
himself.
He was known to be careful with his
hard-earned money but was prepared to give for good causes
and to help out friends in financial problems.
Personal circumstances may well have
helped guide the mind of John Wilkinson when he was making significant
decisions. This is a brief résumé of events. Ironmaster activities are
covered under their own sections.
1728 – John born in Cumbria, Isaac, his
father was an ironmaster. He was the oldest child. Later came a brother,
William (b1744) and three sisters, Mary (married Joseph Priestly), Sarah and
Margaret.
1740 – Moved to Backbarrow.
Educated at Kendal in the Lake District where the Mines Royal had been
established to mine copper.
1754 - John married Ann Mawdsley and moved to Wrexham with
her.
1756 – Daughter Mary was born but Ann died soon afterwards.
John moved to Broseley.
1762 – Cartel formed between John Wilkinson, Isaac Wilkinson
and Abraham Darby for agreed prices for castings for materials for
fire-engines, cylinders, bored items and non-bored items.
1763 - John married Mary Lee, major shareholder at Bersham
ironworks and sister-in-law of Edward Blakeway, one of his partners at
Willey, They moved house to ‘The Lawns’ at Broseley.
1774 – Became Burgess of Much Wenlock.
1775 – First steam engine cylinder bored for James Watt.
1776 - His friend Samuel More, Secretary of the Royal Society
for Arts, Manufacture and Commerce joined Wilkinson in Birmingham for
business meetings and was then Wilkinson’s guest in Broseley. More
continued to help promote Wilkinson’s work until his death in 1797.
1781 – Wilkinson built a new house at Castlehead, Cumbria,
roofing it with his copper.
1785 – He was a key negotiator in setting up and financing
the Cornish Metal Company with Boulton, Vivian, Williams and others.
1785 - Helped to form The United Chamber of Manufacturers of
Great Britain together with Messrs. Reynolds, Boulton, Watt, Wedgwood and
others.
1786, aged 58 and still being refused a partnership, there is
some friction with Boulton but he still regards Watt with affection.
1787 – Launched first iron barge at Broseley.
1787 – He Started minting copper tokens immediately after
encouraging Thomas Williams to start production of his Anglesey tokens. He
accepted office as High Sheriff of Denbighshire..
1795 – John’s brother William gave details of John’s ‘pirate’
steam engines to Boulton and Watt.
They had been built without payment of royalties with tacit agreement of the
senior Boulton and Watt. Their sons did not follow this arrangement. This
will have reduced still further his chances of being offered a partnership.
1802 - Wilkinson had a daughter, Mary Ann, by Ann Lewis, his
mistress at Brymbo. Johnina was born in 1805 and John in 1806 when
Wilkinson was aged 78.
John Wilkinson also had three nephews, Thomas Jones, William Johnston and
Richard Watson.
1806 – His wife, Mary Lee, died at Castlehead.
1808 – Wilkinson died. Ann Lewis lived on at Castlehead with
their children. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
A small selection of names shows the
very wide variety of colleagues and associated interests that occupied the
brain of John Wilkinson.
Anthony Bacon, ironmaster and
government contractor.
Mathew Boulton, industrialist.
James Brindley – canal builder
Henry Cort, ironmaster and
inventor of the iron puddling process and improvements to rolling mills.
Richard Crawshay - ironmaster and
promoter of canals
Abraham Darby III – ironmaster
Erasmus Darwin polymath and
grandfather of Charles Darwin
Samuel More – Secretary, Royal
Society for Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, and good friend.
Thomas Farnolls Pritchard –
architect and inventor.
William Reynolds - ironmaster
Thomas Telford – County Surveyor
and engineer
John Vivian – mining and
copper-smelting entrepreneur.
James Watt – inventor and
mechanical engineer
Josiah Wedgwood - designer and
manufacturer of pottery
William Wilkinson – younger
brother
Thomas Williams – solicitor,
owner of copper mines and associated industries and friend.
For a quick comparative measure with the
spread of activities of contemporary ironmasters, it is interesting to look
at the index to Trinder’s classic study of the Industrial Revolution in
Shropshire. The three Abraham Darbys have a 60mm depth of a column of
contents between them; William Reynolds has 65mm to himself and John
Wilkinson a full 83mm – but this only covers his work in Shropshire. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 | There are many books and papers
relating to the Wilkinson family and John Wilkinson in particular. It
is useful to sort out facts from concurrent and later opinions.
|
 | Because of the wide geographical
spread of interests of John Wilkinson himself, there is no cohesion of
information. |
 | The only museum in Britain with a
useful display noting Wilkinson’s activities is at Bersham.
|
 | The ‘Wilkinson Society’ was formed
in Broseley and is now incorporated in the Broseley Local History
Society. The Society has an annual lecture commemorating Wilkinson, as
does the South Staffordshire Iron and Steel Institute.
|
 | The home that he built at
Castlehead has some useful information. |
 | Many useful papers relating to
Wilkinson’s affairs can be found on websites such as ‘Broseley.org.uk’
and ‘oldcopper.org.uk’ They do get many hits each month from interested
enthusiasts world-wide. |
 | The importance of the Wilkinson
blast furnaces at Backbarrow and Brymbo is scarcely recognised
officially. |
 | Wilkinson’s invaluable help to
Thomas Williams is not mentioned at Amlwch and Parys Mountain Copper
Mine in Anglesey. |
 | His indispensable contribution
towards the creation of the iron bridge and the name of the area is
largely ignored in Ironbridge itself. |
 | Cornwall has a wealth of industrial
history treasures but naturally prefers to acknowledge local inspiration
and entrepreneurs. |
 | The Royal Navy museums at Chatham
and HMS Victory at Portsmouth do not mention the fact that the cannon
that won at Trafalgar and elsewhere were made by Wilkinson, or by others
using his previously patented methods. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
There are many books and papers dealing
with all or aspects of the life and times of John Wilkinson that draw on
what original material has survived. At times the conclusions that the
authors draw vary significantly with some interesting and confusing
results. Here are just a few:
Copper interests
– Butler thought that Wilkinson made poor returns while Soldon reports them
as ‘among his most successful’. The latter now seems more likely.
Cornish Copper Company
– Tann reports that Boulton deputised for Wilkinson during the formation,
most others quote the praise that Boulton heaped on his forceful negotiating
skills.
Tokens –
Turner calculates that Wilkinson made high profits providing to the public a
service of issuing low value tokens and others have repeated it
despite the fact that the calculation is based on a face value of 1d instead
of the actual ½d for the big tonnage issued.
Innovation
– Hayman and Horton describe John Wilkinson as ‘not an innovator himself…..’
yet most other references show a wealth of patents and other innovations
introduced in every area in which he set up enterprises.
The Iron Bridge
- Nikolaus Pevsner states:
‘(The Bridge) was designed by Abraham Darby’. Other sources give Darby
complete credit for building it.
In fact, Wilkinson had negotiated the support and promoted the use of iron
so vigorously that it was this in particular that gained him his ‘Iron Mad’
nickname. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Most of the sites where Wilkinson
established new ironworks were already known for their deposits of iron
ore. They are listed in the ‘Gazetteer of Charcoal-fired Blast Furnaces
since 1660’
but his technology and capital made reworking economic.
Wilkinson gained first training from his
father, Isaac. The original blast furnace is still standing. It was
preserved when the subsequent steelworks on the site used it to encase a
cupola furnace for remelting cast iron.
Isaac Wilkinson took over Bersham
ironworks in 1753 and ran it successfully for a while. John and William
joined him. In 1761 there were financial problems and Isaac moved to
Bristol to enjoy retirement in what was then still the centre of the brass
industry.
In 1763 the New Bersham Ironworks were set up. For the period 1779-1789
the total profits were £414,685, equivalent to £41,173,407 today.
Currently, the Bersham Heritage Centre receives about 12,000 visitors/year,
with 2,500 going to the ironworks site.
‘He had a will
of iron and a temper as hot as his furnaces but he was the man who made
things viable’.
1792 Wilkinson bought the Brymbo estate
of c500 acres including three farms and Brymbo Hall. ‘Old No 1’ blast
furnace was built 1796 and ran until 1894, it was then used as a sand store
for the adjacent foundry and still survives. A second furnace brought
output up to 4,000 tons per year. It was blown out in 1892 and demolished
but the site can still be seen. By the time it was sold in 1829 the site
had six steam engines mainly used for raising coal from the 41 coal pits.
The works became part of Guest, Keen and Nettlefold, then British Steel
Corporation until closed in 1991. It is still privately owned but a
dedicated team of enthusiasts is working towards restoration when funding is
available.
In 1757, Wilkinson leased the Old Willey
furnaces that worked until 1774.
He then leased a site nearby for the New Willey furnaces and works. By 1761
the premises, machinery, buildings and stock were valued at £35,000.
In 1804, the New Willey closed at expiry of the lease that also required
that the site be cleared. Three buildings have survived but the potential
of the site has never been excavated.
Coalbrookdale
Wilkinson signed with the ground
landlords to take over the lease of the Coalbrookdale Company’s site in 1757.
When there were legal objections, he suggested a joint venture but this was
rejected. He concentrated instead on the New Willey developments.
The works opened 1778 with two blast
furnaces and producing 3,400 tons iron/year by 1796. It was sold in 1793 to
finance Brymbo.
The site became part of the Lilleshall Company in 1816.
Works on Randlay Brook, about half a
mile from Snedshill and on the same site, near Oakengates.
Wilkinson bought the ground in 1791 and
established the New Hadley Works near Wombridge, Shropshire with two blast
furnaces served by 27 mines
and a works with 7 steam engines. One furnace would produce 30 tons iron/
week. The works was closed in 1820’s.
Hampton (Loade)
This site is about four miles south of
Bridgnorth. One reference quotes Wilkinson as owning one blast furnace here
c1800
but this has not been verified anywhere else.
Wilkinson is recognised as the founder
of the South Staffordshire Iron Industry. In 1766 John set up Bradley
Ironworks in Bilston, Staffordshire
(or c1758?)
over coal measures approximately 30ft thick. In 1772 he bought the manor
and estate of Bradley for an 88-acre ironmaking complex of furnaces, rolling
mills, brick works, pottery and canal wharf.
In 1783 the first Boulton & Watt
‘rotative’ engine was installed at Bradley
and in 1786, Boilermaking was started using rolled wrought iron. By 1815
there were 5,000 employees at Bilston, Bradley and Priestfield, one of the
largest labour forces in Britain.
‘All those qualities of character
associated with Wilkinson’s business life in the Midlands are here again
demonstrated, shrewd appraisal of the situation and a nice balance of
advantage to either side, imaginative foresight, and again enormous boldness
and confidence’. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Recognising a national need for reliable
cannon that did not explode in use, Wilkinson adopted the use of solid
rather than cored castings and a rigid lathe that gave reproducible circular
bores. His patent, No. 1063 of 1774, was revoked by the government so that
all suppliers could use the method. He retained a good share of the
contracts placed.
Costings by William Wilkinson showed the
cost of making cannon in quantity for the British Navy in quantity and
delivering them to Woolwich Arsenal for testing was of the order of £11 per
ton, of which £4 per ton was for transport
. He seems to have had
casting and boring capacity for about 4,000 tons of cannon per year.
Contract prices from the Board of Ordnance were £18-£20 per ton, giving an
apparent 80% profit, about £28,000 per year over a works cashflow of
£44,000. There also had to be some allowance for possible loss during
shipping round the coast and during the proof testing. Wilkinson’s cannon
were of high quality and expected to pass the 40 test firings with ease,
which meant that nearly all production was accepted, and his wealth
increased. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘John Wilkinson was the important third
man in the firm of Boulton & Watt, though he was never a properly
constituted business partner’.
One of the first Boulton and Watt designed steam engines was installed by
John Wilkinson at the New Willey Ironworks, Broseley, Shropshire. Every
effort was made to ensure success in order to impress neighbouring
ironmasters. Boulton and Watt had to outsource the castings for such large
machines and were very happy with the castings that Wilkinson had supplied
for their trial engines, especially the close tolerances with which he could
work in making large cast cylinders. None of the parts was made at Soho;
everything was manufactured at Wilkinson’s works.
Watt supervised the erection in early 1776 and was well pleased with the
excellence of the workmanship. A year later, Wilkinson also made the
components for the ‘inverted’ or ‘Topsy Turvy’ engine built at New Willey to
drive the cannon-boring lathe. With his experience and his well-known
reputation for high quality finish-machined castings, he was the preferred
supplier of main components with a 20-yr exclusive contract for cylinders
for other engines.
Early in their development of the steam
engine business in Cornwall, Boulton and Watt needed more capital than they
had available. Wilkinson offered to subscribe directly but was not
accepted. This left him as a usefully knowledgeable independent negotiator
later, when relations between the engine makers and the Cornish mine owners
became very strained. He still had their good will and confidence.
Mine owners who owed Wilkinson for the
cost of castings might have a choice of payment methods. Some paid cash,
others paid in kind with tons of copper and yet others with shares in their
mines. Alternatively, he took payment in block tin.
Since the prosperity of the mines would, and did, increase when the engines
came on stream, he could see a good advantage in taking shares.
There was an agreement that required
engine owners to pay a royalty to Boulton and Watt, being one third of their
coal savings each year. The advantage to the Cornish owners was that their
engines were paid for out of revenue rather than scarce capital. When the
copper prices fell, their profitability suffered and they tried to
renegotiate the terms. Wilkinson was then asked to act as an honest
broker. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In 1761 there was a large increase in
the demand for copper when the Royal Navy clad the frigate ‘Alarm’ at and
below the water line to prevent attack by Teredo woodworm in tropical
waters. It was found that copper also reduced the growth of marine
biofouling, giving a significant benefit to the speed of ships that were at
sea for long periods. Wilkinson was already concerned with the business of
supplying cannon for the urgent needs of the Royal Navy, such as HMS
Victory, launched in 1765. He was also supplying components for steam
engines for the copper mines of Cornwall. He could therefore see more
profits possible if he took an interest in the copper industry, which had
many requirements that were similar to those of the iron industry.
Besides the mines in Cornwall, copper
was rediscovered in 1768 at Parys Mountain in Anglesey, North Wales. For a
time the mine was the largest in the world. By 1780, Wilkinson had met
Thomas Williams, a solicitor of Llanidan who had gained control of most of
the Anglesey copper mines, and arranged to visit the ‘Great Open Cast’
workings. He concluded:
‘It’s a curious place and affords a
large field for speculation.’. Unknowingly, he had coined a phrase
since used by Hope as a book title.
He could see opportunities in the copper
industry for the supply of steam engines, structural components and scrap
iron for use in the copper precipitation tanks. After roasting, the ore was
leached in one of many brick lined tanks described as 24ft x 12ft wide and
3ft deep.
To precipitate the copper from solution, iron was thrown in, in large
quantities. If scrap was not available, cast slabs 3ft x 2ft x 2in were
used. This tonnage was useful to Wilkinson as a market for scrap and as an
entrance to a prospering industry. He also experimented successfully with
the use of the cement copper deposited directly in his foundry for bronze
cannon without further refining.
Heavy cast iron plates were also used on the floors of the recovery
condensers for sulphur and arsenic that were attached to ore roasting
furnaces. They were rapidly corroded by the acid, giving more good
business.
There was also money to be made
downstream of the mines in by-product recovery and the trading of copper as
a commodity. Wilkinson and Williams became friends in several enterprises
and benefited from their different backgrounds and training but similar
attitudes to making money wherever possible. They introduced vertical
integration of the industry from mine to finished product and warehousing.
In 1781, they made a joint visit to Scotland for reasons not established but
probably to evaluate copper mines or visit iron works.
While ironmaking was the first love of
John Wilkinson, he made more money than could be re-invested in the iron
industry with advantage. He naturally looked for better returns elsewhere.
His special technical, financial and political skills were transferable to
other industries and commodities. He built up a portfolio of shares in
Cornish copper mines
such as:-
 | Consolidated Mines, Gwennap, with
seven Newcomen engines to be updated. At the time the Gwennap area was
the hub of Cornwall’s richest mining area. |
 | United Mines, formed from six mines
in the Gwennap area |
 | Poldice
Mine, active in 17th century, which makes it one of the earliest record
in Cornwall. Poldice Mine produced over 150,000 tons copper ore, 1,500
tons tin and 2,500 tons arsenic. 1787 copper sales amounted to £11,315,
compared with tin sales of £9,868. 1792 the mine produced 575 tons of
copper ore in two months, sales for 1792-98 inclusive amounting to
£151,471. 1793 Bolton and Watt refused, on account of the money owed
them by the mine, to deliver a 66-inch double (compound) engine for the
mine, odd inasmuch as the mine looked to be profitable at that time.
|
 | North Downs, Gwennap |
 | Scorrier Mines, Gwennap
|
 | Wheal Busy, between Redruth and
Truro, Gwennap-Chacewater mining district. |
 | Tresaven Mine, Gwennap where the
first Cornish ‘man engine’ was later installed, and |
 | Chasewater Mine, later part of
Wheal Busy and home to the first Boulton & Watt engine in Cornwall, 1778.
|
Some of these shares may have been taken
in lieu of payments. When these were bought and sold is not clear but the
success of some of the mines is included by Symons in his review of Vivian’s
evidence in 1799 to the Parliamentary Committee inquiring into the copper
mines.
It is noted that many of the adventurers who invested were also equipment
suppliers and happy to take their profits on what they supplied. He also
mentions the common saying of the time that ‘It is much easier to throw tin
into a mine than get it out!’
However, in a survey of the profits and
losses made by a sample of sixteen of the many Cornish mines in the period
1792 –1798, Symons covers four of the eight mines in which Wilkinson had
shares at some time. Consolidated Mines and United Mines both made a
reasonable profit. North Downs and Tresaven ended up slightly in the red.
This would be regarded as satisfactory at the time.
He took a one sixteenth interest in the
Mona copper mine at Parys and the associated ore treatment, copper
production and chemical industries together capitalised at £800,000.
These included
 | Greenfield Copper and Brass
Company, Holywell, Flintshire. |
 | Stanley Smelting Co, St. Helens,
near Liverpool and at Swansea, South Wales. |
By November 1785, Wilkinson was able to
say to Matthew Boulton
“All my adventuring cash is now
engaged”
– and, we assume, giving a good profit.
Sometime around the period of 1790-1805,
Wilkinson sold most of his copper shares in Cornwall,
going liquid in order to invest in more land around his ‘retirement home’ in
Castlehead and district. By the time he died, he only had Mona Mine,
Anglesey, shares in his portfolio. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Parys Mine Current Costings
At the Parys Mine there are still 6
million tons of economic ore explored and recoverable. There is current
planning permission for the extraction of 1,000 tons per day. This contains
over 6% zinc, 1.30% copper, 3.3% lead and 75g silver per ton. Gold would be
recovered at about 75kg per year. An investment of £22 million is required.
This gives a graphic update compared with the 18th century,
during which the ore extracted gave a total of 130,000 tons of copper.
This type of project would obviously interest the likes of John Wilkinson
but since the copper would be electro-won from a leach solution, possible
closure of the local power station makes starting the project difficult. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
‘Wilkinson’s
tokens were a show of manufacturing power and independence’.
During the late 18th century,
the Government was not issuing small denomination coins. There was a dire
shortage of money to meet demand for wages as spending money for workers who
were earning only a very few shillings per week. At this time, Wilkinson
employed over a thousand workers.
Silver coins of small value were impracticably minute. Wilkinson had
encouraged his friend Thomas Williams to issue his Anglesey tokens (known as
‘Druids’) for the same practical reason as well as the fact that Williams
needed another tonnage market for his copper. Wilkinson started ordering
tokens for himself very shortly afterwards and continued production from
1787 to 1793. They became commonly known as ‘Willeys’
In 1781, Francis and Samuel Garbett,
friends of Boulton, had undertaken an officially commissioned report on
shortage of coinage but government action was slow. Boulton had to wait
more than ten years for the contract so turned to other orders such as the
Parys Mines token and Wilkinson tokens.
The tokens all bore the effigy of
Wilkinson on the obverse. One design shows his hair tied back and two
buttons of his coat. Some later tokens showed him with extra sets of curls
to his wig and with three buttons displayed. The reverse of each token
celebrated one or more of his achievements. Some are:
 | The interior of a hammer shop with
forgemaster using tongs to support work being struck. |
 | A nude figure of Vulcan seated on a
low anvil with hammer raised to strike metal on a higher anvil. In the
background is part of a sailing vessel. The ship is a brig and is not
included in the list of those built at Amlwch,
it is more likely to have been a Swansea boat.
|
 | A seated blacksmith working at his
anvil with a cargo ship in the background. |
Most genuine tokens have been edge
rolled with the inscription that covers the towns where the tokens could be
redeemed: ‘Willey Snedshill Bersham Bradley’.
The Wilkinson obverse was used with many
other reverses by different mints to make a wide variety of forgeries or
‘mules’.
Sometimes the obverse was wrongly struck with spellings such as ‘Wilkenson’
and ‘Wilkison’. The standard classification of tokens of this age is by
Dalton and Hamer and there are well over a hundred ‘D&H’ numbers covering
Wilkinson token varieties, forgeries and mules. From the start, the
classification of the tokens was confused, being allocated to Warwickshire.
Since then there have been many articles written covering the topic and it
is difficult to know what to believe! They remain some of the best-known
and collected examples of tokens and continue to ensure that the branding of
himself that John Wilkinson initiated will never be lost. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
It is not easy to show whether Wilkinson
made a profit on issuing his tokens. To do so it would be necessary to
know:
 | Cost of production |
 | Cost of distribution |
 | Profit on sales |
 | Costs of redemption |
 | Promotional value |
The promotional value came from the fact
that Wilkinson’s image was on every token, an intentional, useful spin-off.
The number of contemporary forgeries made might have increased his
redemption costs.
Janet Butler quotes his specification as
36 tokens per pound weight. This seems to have applied only from 1780. All
of the issues, from 1787 through to 1795, featured Wilkinson's portrait
facing right..
Boulton was able to supply the tokens to better reproducibility by striking
between dies fitted with a collar that retained the diameter accurately.
They were edge rolled with the legend: ‘WILLEY SNEDSHILL BERSHAM BRADLEY’
where they could easily be redeemed. Steam driven presses were used for
standard tokens from 1789 and die collars could be used in steam presses
from the Autumn of 1790.
Many tons were ordered, initially from Boulton and later from Westwood’s
mint.
The 1790 Vulcan token was struck at
15cwt/week from Westwood to a total of 206,000 tokens. Seeing products from
the opposition, Boulton commented to Wilkinson that he should have all
tokens struck in collars. However, on December 11th 1790,
Wilkinson complained to Boulton that the halfpence were four in the pound
less in number than those which Westwood used to make for him.
In 1791 he was ordering tokens by the ton from both Westwood and Boulton.
The 1792 Vulcan issue numbered 103,000 tokens. Hancock’s mint struck the
tokens that have Vulcan in reverse.
If the Westwood tokens were struck without the use of collars it might mean
that some tokens without the edge legend ‘WILLEY SNEDSHILL BERSHAM BRADLEY’
are genuine rather than fakes.
One calculation has been around for some
time:
,
 | Tokens at 32 to the pound weight,
|
 | Value 2/8d
against a mint contract for striking at 1/11d per pound |
 | Profit 9d /lb, |
 | Return on capital approx. 40%
|
It is not clear where the costings came
from but it is very unlikely that anyone, even John Wilkinson, could have
got away with making a profit of 40% selling tokens! There were initial
plans to issue tokens to the value of one penny but none was officially
issued. Certainly the initial specification was for 32 tokens to the pound
but the value would have been ¼d
which would have shown a loss of 5d per pound,
equally unlikely.
Collected tokens have been weighed to
check conformance to original specification. While ‘mint’ ones are not
available, an effort was made to ensure that the sample tokens were not
unduly worn. There was a check that sufficient detail still remained in the
effigy. If it was not possible to count the number of buttons on
Wilkinson’s coat the weight was not included. The numbers in the boxes are
the sample sizes. A plot
shows the average weight of tokens issued for each year. Clearly the
specified weight of each token diminishes with time. Obviously the makers
are economising on copper ahead of the rise in price. Tokens issued during
the 1790-1794 period should have netted a profit both for the mint and their
customers after considering the minting, transport and distribution costs.
In 1797, Boulton secured a contract from the government for minting 1d and
2d pieces (‘Cartwheel’ pennies) at the standard of the correct weight of
copper for the value of the coin. This reduced the demand for commercial
tokens. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Wilkinson bought lead mines at Minera,
five miles from Bersham and Llyn y Pandy at Soughton and Mold, also in
Flintshire, where John Wilkinson’s steam pumping engines made deep mining
viable.
All the Flintshire lead was exported through the port of Chester which
handled about 80,000 tons over the 20 years from 1758-1777.
Minera Lead Mines are in Wern Road,
Wrexham. Lead mining reached its peak at Minera in 1863-4 when 6,822 tons
of lead ore and 1,179 tons of zinc ore were mined. Profits were just under
£70,000 for that year. Yet by 1890s the price for lead ore had collapsed.
In 1910, the pumping machinery was sold and the mine closed in 1914.
There is a restored engine house at the top of the 1,220ft deep City Shaft
at Minera Lead Mine. He also owned limekilns at Minera, Ffrith and Hope
Mountain, Flintshire.
Using the lead produced, he had a lead
pipe works at Rotherhithe,
London, next to his Gun Wharf. This was subsequently run by H. J. Enthoven
& Co (now part of Quexco Inc.) at their Upper Ordnance Wharf Works until the
1980s. Latterly the factory was producing lead solder alloys that were
shipped down the River Thames for use as body fillers at the Ford factory in
Dagenham.
The longevity of production from this site is quite remarkable. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
These are some of the industries
referred to above that are part of the vertical integration of the copper
industry in which Wilkinson could obtain good returns.
 | Greenfield Copper and Brass
Company, Holywell, Clwyd on the North Wales coast and Cheadle,
Staffordshire. |
 | Stanley Smelting Company,
St Helens, Lancs and Swansea. |
 | Wharfs and warehouses at Chester,
Cheshire and Rotherhithe, London. |
 | Copper metal stock sales from
warehouses in Birmingham, London and elsewhere. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
With the development of the Industrial
Revolution in the Severn Gorge region it became essential to build another
bridge across the river, higher up than that at Bridgnorth. This would link
both sides of the Severn Gorge industrial area. Thomas Farnolls Pritchard
was an architect who had worked with John Wilkinson, having designed and
installed a new fireplace at ‘The Lawns’ amongst other projects. He had
also procured castings from Coalbrookdale. In 1773, he suggested designs
for the bridge across the gorge between Broseley and Madeley. ‘Iron Mad’
John Wilkinson insisted that cast iron should be the structural material.
Ironmaster Abraham Darby was glad to join the project group and most of the
remainder of the initial support came from the residents of Broseley.
The group subscribed Darby's first
estimate of the cost, £3,150:-
|
Initial Subscribers |
£/-/- |
|
John Wilkinson, ironmaster |
630/-/- |
|
Abraham Darby, ironmaster |
757/10/- |
|
Edward Blakeway Esq., draper |
105/-/- |
|
Charles Guest, grocer |
105/-/- |
|
Roger Kynaston, Esq. |
52/10/- |
|
Edward Harries Clark |
52/5/- |
|
Leonard Jennings, miller |
52/5/- |
|
John Morris, maltster |
105/-/- |
|
John Thursfield, surgeon |
52/10/- |
|
Serjeant Roden |
52/10/- |
|
John Hartshorn, surgeon |
52/10/- |
|
Thomas Farnells Pritchard,
architect |
105/-/- |
|
John Nicholson, ‘Swan Inn’
landlord |
52/10/- |
|
Total |
£3,150/-/- |
The figures quoted are in
pre-decimalisation pounds, shillings and pence (£/s/d) although originally quoted in
guineas where one guinea is £1/1s/-. For example, the contribution of John
Wilkinson was of 600 guineas.) |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Wilkinson’s persuasion and drive held
together the Broseley support through a few problems and this unanimity
helped the acquisition of the big names needed to push the proposal through
parliament.
Abraham Darby agreed to build what would be the world’s first major iron
bridge using his local iron foundry. To strengthen Darby’s hand, Wilkinson
then passed his shares to Darby. The bridge opened in 1781 with the cost to
Darby much higher than his original estimate.
Had Wilkinson not held together the
supporting group as he did, the bridge might have been constructed in timber
or stone. Consequently, the name ‘Ironbridge’ would not have been coined
for the riverside area of Madeley and the area would not have qualified for
World Heritage status. As a worst scenario, the Abraham Darby furnace might
still be in a similar condition to the ones at Backbarrow and Brymbo!
Therefore, Wilkinson deserves significant credit from the present £76
million spent each year by the 2.6 million visitors coming to the Telford
area each year. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
John Wilkinson built the first canal
barge made of iron for use on the River Severn and further navigation
towards Birmingham. It was called ‘The Trial’ and built at Willey Wharf
from cast iron plates made at the New Willey Furnace.
The waiting audience expected it to sink but it was successfully launched in
July 1787.
Soon afterwards, in October 1787, some barges were built at Bradley from
wrought iron sheet rolled at the mill there. Initially the cost of iron
boats was higher than for those made of wood, although they outlasted the
wood significantly and iron soon became the standard material for boat
building. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Ships
Wilkinson needed to ship to and from
ports all round the coast such as:- Amlwch, Bristol, Chatham, Chepstow,
Chester, Gloucester, Greenwich, Liverpool, London Rotherhithe and Swansea.
He did buy at least one seagoing ship, calling her ‘The Mary’ but later
preferred to charter ships for both coastal trade and exports. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Since the cost of transport of goods by
canal was about one tenth of that by road, Wilkinson was a keen investor in
canal building projects such as:
 | Birmingham Canal Company |
 | Ellesmere Canal Company |
 | Flint Coal Canal |
 | River Kent – River Lune Waterway |
 | River Severn navigability |
 | Shrewsbury Canal |
 | Shropshire Canal Navigation |
 | Trent and Mersey Canal |
Most were successful for years, giving a
good return on capital invested until eclipsed by railways. Some are now in
use again as valuable amenities. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Railways
Wilkinson laid tramways wherever needed,
especially from his works to the nearest wharfage. There is no record of
him trying steam traction. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Wilkinson was the first to realise and
to obtain the accuracy needed in the making of modern machinery.
His inventions and patents included:-
675/1753 Metallic Rollers
for Grinding Grain and Sugar Canes
713/1757
Blowing Machine for Forges, Furnaces Etc.
Method of boring cylinders for
steam engines using a boring bar supported by bearings each side of the work
piece. This technique was not patented and was copied by Coalbrookdale and
by Banks and Onions among others. He helped design the new lathe at the
Soho Manufactory and provided a suitable boring bar from Bersham.
1063/1774
Method of Boring Cannon including making a coreless or solid casting and
mounting it to rotate round the boring bar. This was such a strategic
advantage that the Board of Ordinance had the patent revoked in 1779.
All founders used the Wilkinson method for years thereafter and it was a
major contributor towards the defeat of the enemies of Britain.
1694/1789
Cutting Spiral Grooves in Bore of Cannon (Rifling) and Bolted or Winged Shot
applicable thereto.
1857/1792
Rolling Metals, the use of two steam engines, one for each direction to
give a reversing mill, alternately the use of one steam engine with bands
operating on the up and down strokes.
1993/1794 Manufacture of Iron
(use of a new furnace lower than a blast furnace and the addition of
Manganese). This use of manganese was also later patented by Reynolds in
1799.
1799 New idea for a Chimney Boiler,
beautifully coloured drawing given to William Reynolds, drawing No 47 in the
possession of John Randall, 1880.
First to make iron chairs, horse pattens, vats for
breweries & distilleries and iron pipes of all sizes.
First Iron Boat.
The value of each idea will depend on
the novelty and the length of time for which it was useful. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Bersham –
Wilkinson acquired about 1,000 acres of agricultural land which he improved
with lime from his works and good husbandry. He was the only member of the
Royal Society of Arts & Manufactures to participate fully in an experimental
scheme to grow good hemp.
Castlehead
– Wilkinson bought 1,000 acres of land in stages, initially for the peat and
then for reclamation by erecting a sea wall, drainage and irrigation. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cornish miners and Thomas Williams, the
Anglesey mine owner, agreed to set up a joint marketing company for copper.
This would help stop the refiners from forcing prices down by what was known
as the ‘ticketing’ system by which refiners made offers on batches of ore.
The subscribed capital was to be used to finance copper stocks but subject
to an 8% sinking fund levy for payment of interest. It was arranged that
Thomas Williams would have control of the sales of copper, an arrangement
that lasted from 1787 to 1792.
Wilkinson obtained shares in most of Williams’ enterprises.
Warehouses were established to sell the
copper where needed in Birmingham, London, Bristol and Liverpool. The
Company was less successful than expected for a variety of reasons but that
is not to say that it was Wilkinson who lost out. Wilkinson had sold his
iron castings successfully in both Cornwall and Anglesey, had taken shares
in mines in Cornwall, mines and manufactures connected with Anglesey, and
also warehouses dealing in copper. He was brokering copper refining
capacity and copper stocks. In addition, he could draw his 8% interest on
the Company capital.
By 1787, the Company was in crisis due
to falling copper prices. Boulton and Vivian visited Wilkinson at ‘The
Lawns’ in Broseley before they went to see Williams and then on to London to
lobby Pitt about coinage and called for Wilkinson to join them.
When the company was wound up, the
shareholders regained their money.
The other arrangements that John Wilkinson had had bolted on to the Company
structure had probably rewarded his foresight quite usefully.
1788 Birmingham Warehouse Company
In 1788, Wilkinson joined the venture to
set up the Birmingham Warehouse Company with the laudable intention of
providing the Birmingham industry with steady supplies copper at reasonable
prices. The motive was to avoid the dependence of the Birmingham trade on
supplies controlled from Bristol. The others involved were Matthew Boulton,
James Watt, and John Hurd, with Thomas Williams as a preferred supplier. A
subsidiary motive was to help Williams through a cash flow problem to the
extent of £10,000.
The arrangement with Williams was that they could take delivery at
advantageous Liverpool or Swansea prices, unlike other warehouses that paid
significantly more for transportation costs.
Banks
To help with his business, with payments
to his employees and for local benefit, Wilkinson bought in to partnership
in several banks including:-
 | Brymbo Ironworks Bank |
 | Eyton, Reynolds & Bishop,
Shrewsbury Bank |
 | Wilkinson & Co Bank at Bradley and
Bilston |
 | Wilkinson, Startin, Smith & Smith,
Union St, Birmingham.
|
His tokens were also redeemable at the
usual rate of 480 to the Sterling pound at the works offices at Willey and
Snedshill.
Wilkinson was happy to join trade bodies
and help with representations and negotiations.
A cartel of Severn Valley ironmasters
who agreed prices during the 1760s for the sale of cast iron products.
The United Chamber of Manufacturers of
Great Britain (with Messrs Boulton, Reynolds, Watt, Wedgwood and others,
1785). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In areas where Wilkinson had strong
interests he invested in a domestic base. The value of these capital assets
would have been additional to the value of plant and machinery mentioned
when his will is discussed. Later, many of them passed into other hands and
served many purposes. Some are still valuable assets.
Set up as Headquarters home with his
second wife, Mary Lee, in 1763 and retained until 1800 when it was leased to
John Rose of Coalport china. In private ownership, it is still a landmark
building on the ‘Broseley Trail’.
Used by the National Health Service from
1974 until 1993. Demolished soon afterwards because of coal mining
subsidence.
Now demolished.
Bought with estate in 1792 for £14,000
and where he set up home for his mistress, Ann Lewis, subsequently used as
company headquarters until early 20th century but demolished in
1973 to allow open pit coal mining.
Home with his first wife, Ann Maudsley.
Built 1770 and used as home by Mary,
second wife (1730-1806), then by Ann Lewis and their children. Now in use
as a field studies centre. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Wilkinson had a good reputation as an
employer. Wherever a new works was established, cottages were built to
accommodate the employees and their families. Employee pensions were
given. He was happy to help the spread of technology by inviting guests to
view his works. He also took on apprentices such as the son of James Watt.
He is reported as giving charitable support, such as to the Madeley Poor
Fund, 1795, £50.
At Bradley he built a chapel of iron and furnished it with a pulpit also
made of cast iron.
In local schools, Wilkinson was able to
overcome a shortage of slates and chalk by providing simple iron trays to
hold suitable sand for writing and arithmetical practice.
He gave private support when needed,
such as that of his brother-in-law, Dr Joseph Priestly in the sum of up to
£10,000.
He was elected Broseley church warden in 1753
and later became High Sheriff of Denbighshire |
|
| |
|
|
| |
In Cumbria, the Wilkinson’s blast
furnace at Backbarrow has recently been included for preservation within an
area of housing development. His main house at Castlehead is now accessible
as a field studies centre and his father’s cottage still in residential
use. In Cornwall there is a considerable mining and industrial heritage but
the main emphasis is not surprisingly on the work of Richard Trevithick and
those who developed the ‘Cornish’ steam engine.
In Denbighshire, there is a
well-established popular visitor centre and museum covering the iron
industry at Bersham. A small group of enthusiasts is working hard to
preserve the Wilkinson blast furnace and a variety of other exhibits at
nearby Brymbo.
In Shropshire, ‘The Lawns’, his house in
Broseley, is in private hands but easily seen from the road. It is one of
many fascinating properties of the period in the town. The ‘Old Willey’ and
‘New Willey’ sites are mainly green fields with interesting local
geography. At present, John Wilkinson’s historic activities and these areas
are, strangely, not promoted within the Ironbridge Gorge section of the
River Severn Valley. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
As David Cannadine said to a meeting of
the Newcomen Society:
‘Britain has been one of the few
great technological nations’, and we await the history which both describes
that and explains it. All of which is simply to say that the history of
technology has for a long time been much more than the history of machinery
and engineering, important though those histories undoubtedly are.
He implies that a combination of
technical expertise with an ability to think laterally, financial acumen and
a mastery of human relationships gives the recipe for success. John
Wilkinson certainly had all these abilities. For a comparison with the
entrepreneurs of this generation, I suggest that he would be the ‘Richard
Branson’ of his day.
The benefits accrued from the activities
of an industrialist can be assessed by many possible means. A spreadsheet
can be constructed so that each activity can be listed together with
perceived benefits in each category. To put financial benefits in
perspective, each needs to be adjusted for inflation that occurred during
Wilkinson’s lifetime
and updated to nett present values.
For the Telford area, the impact of
Cambridge Local Area Model
has been used to estimate the economic benefits of tourism
in terms of numbers of visitors and employment supported. These can be used
to estimate the potential added benefit of including examples of Wilkinson’s
activities in new and existing interpretive displays. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Inflation in the 18th Century
Between 1750 and 1800 inflation was
66%. Between 1771 and 1800 inflation was 41%.
Then, as now, to retain the value of any capital, it had to be put to work
or lose its value. Some comparisons have been made with the basic commodity
prices then and now. The variations in commodity prices that happened
during Wilkinson’s lifetime mean that only approximate comparisons with
today’s values can be made. Prices and business decisions were much
affected by external events affecting the demand for materials and capital
equipment. Amongst these were:
1756-1763 Anglo-French War (Seven Years War) – all
major European powers involved
1775-1783 American War of Independence (Anglo French
War also involving Spain and Netherlands)
1789-1799 French Revolution and
1792-1802 Wars of the French Revolution
1802-1815 The Napoleonic Wars |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Inflation of the Price of Bread
For simplicity, when comparing the
buying power of wages, the price of bread is often used. Confusion must
first be avoided. Bread was commonly sold in medieval and Renaissance
England as the gallon loaf (also called the
half-peck loaf), which weighs 8lb 11oz (or approx.
8.7lb, 3.9kg). Later, including during the Victorian period, it was nearly
always sold as the quartern loaf, made with
exactly ¼stone (3½lb) of flour, and whose finished weight was approximately
4.33lb
(1.96kg). The modern large tin loaf weighs about 1lb 10oz (0.74kg). The
price of bread varied seasonally and with the demands of various wars on
manpower. In 1798 it was around 1.85d/lb
(old pence per pound).
Inflation of the price of Copper
During the period 1750-1810, the price
of copper varied within the range £50-£120/ton. Recently it has varied
within the range £3,000 to £6,000/ton, though officially priced in US
dollars.
Inflation of the prices of cast iron
During the period 1750-1810, the price
of cast iron varied within the range £7-£18 per ton of finished goods.
Currently it sells at £150-160/ton but has been much higher within the last
few years.
Present Values
There were big variations in the value
of money compared with 2009 during the period 1750-1810,
summarised in the table below that shows the multiplier to be used for
individual years in each decade.
|
Year |
Multiplier |
|
1810 |
59.0 |
|
1800 |
63.0 |
|
1790 |
110.0 |
|
1780 |
130.0 |
|
1770 |
140.0 |
|
1760 |
150.0 |
|
1750 |
170.0 |
A typical multiplier of 86 has recently
been used by Grenter
so will also be used elsewhere in this paper for continuity. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
During the lifetime:
By 1800 Wilkinson had 8 blast furnaces
working.
To obtain a full analysis of the impact of Wilkinson, it would be necessary
to start with statistics such as:-
 | The number of direct employees and
their families |
 | The people benefitting indirectly. |
 | Capital accrued |
 | Infrastructure established |
 | Intellectual property created |
 | Domestic benefits |
These figures are of course only
sketchily available so a generalisation will be used based on estimated
annual turnover. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Benefits to the Economy and Society
Some useful estimates can be made,
others will use nominal figures. In this short paper, it is taken that
financial indicators will be a reasonable initial measure of benefits to
employees and their families. Wilkinson tried to make good provision for
all his loved ones. The estate was proved at a value of £130,000 (2009 =
£8.7m)
for machinery, not including his land and house values. He wanted Ann Lewis
and their children to have the surname ‘Wilkinson’, an annuity and live at
Castle Head.
To summarise his impact there is a need
to consider:
 | Duration of benefits accruing from
lifetime activities. |
 | Family inheritance of skills and
viable business. |
 | Inspirational effects |
 | Technical and Tourist interest in
industrial history. |
 | Ongoing technical and tourist
interest in industrial history. |
|
|
| |
These factors are considered together in the overall figures
as estimates. English Heritage does have a methodology for estimating
heritage dividend values that applies when justifying new restoration
projects
but this is not applicable to the value of the existing site. The current
value of existing relics of Wilkinson’s life is not easily estimated,
frequently because of complications occurring through subsequent
developments. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Robert Burns
By way of comparison with other
celebrities having currently celebrated anniversaries, a recent BBC
programme carried an estimate of the current value of Robert Burns
(1759-1796)
to Ayrshire, Scotland.
Commemorative merchandise, food, and celebratory drink sales and service
added up to about £9 million per year but tourist income brought the total
to an estimated £159,000,000. In detail, this includes:
|
Value to Ayrshire |
£k/y |
|
Extra Tourism to Burns’ Ayrshire
Heritage sites |
150,000 |
|
Whiskey for Burns’ Night suppers |
300 |
|
Burns’ Night entertainers fees |
330 |
|
|
|
|
Profits for organisers and
caterers |
1,000 |
|
Merchandise including
shortbread, fridge magnets, mats, souvenirs etc, mostly based on the
Nasmith portrait. |
3,300 |
|
Other items |
3,000 |
|
Total annual economic benefit
per year, approximately |
159,250 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Charles Darwin
In total contrast to the way that the
present value of Burns has been costed, it seems impossible to estimate the
current significance of the legacy of the painstaking revolutionary work by
Charles Darwin (1809-1882). There is tourist interest in sites in
Shrewsbury, Shropshire and Orpington, Kent and his books are usefully
reprinted but a realistic valuation of the value of his discoveries requires
a challenging methodology! |
|
| |
|
|
| |
John Wilkinson
The impact of each of John Wilkinson’s
activities needs to be summarised, including:
 |
Iron furnaces and works, including fuel, limestone etc. |
 | Inventions and
The Iron Bridge |
 | Copper
Interests |
 | Lead interests |
 | Transport
interests |
 | Banks and
Tokens |
 | Agriculture,
Houses & Philanthropy |
 | Arbitration
and Social Help |
To give detailed breakdown of the impact
on numbers of employees and their families, works districts, customers,
transport contractors and business partners would be impractical. It is
proposed to take some arbitrary figures for his times and inflate them to
current values to gain an initial sense of proportion. Residuary estate
figures are not entered separately, they are assumed included in the values
given. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Notional Values for Industrial and Social Impact of John
Wilkinson’s Interests
(These estimates are based on the
considerations above, being calculated on estimated turnover rather than
profits. Most of the turnover would have been paid out for services
and materials, to the local benefit.)
|
|
Value, c1800 |
Value, c2009 (1800 x 86) |
|
|
£k |
£k |
|
Iron furnaces and works,
including mines for ore, fuel, limestone etc. |
1,500 |
130,000 |
|
Inventions and Iron Bridge |
103 |
8,250 |
|
Copper Interests |
50 |
4,100 |
|
Lead
interests |
20 |
1,700 |
|
Transport interests |
20 |
1,700 |
|
Banks
and Tokens |
20 |
1,700 |
|
Agriculture, Houses & Philanthropy |
20 |
1,700 |
|
Arbitration and Social Help |
40 |
3,400 |
|
Total (approx) |
1,800 |
152,500 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Current Notional Annual Values of the Visitor Interests
of Wilkinson-related sites
(No charges are made at present for
entry to any sites.)
|
|
£k/y |
|
Backbarrow Blast Furnace
(private land) |
5 |
|
Bersham Heritage Centre and
Ironworks, Minera lead mine |
1,000 |
|
British Waterways canals (small
proportion) |
10 |
|
Brymbo ‘Old No 1’ Blast Furnace
(private land) |
25 |
|
Parys Copper Mine & Amlwch
Heritage Museum
(small proportion) |
25 |
|
Iron Bridge, (Telford
Corporation) (half current income) |
38,000 |
|
Broseley, Willey Furnaces and
ironworks sites |
250 |
|
Total Notional Values |
39,315 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
This paper has presented a very brief
survey of the very wide spread of the industrial and other interests of John
Wilkinson abstracted from an extensive range of literature. It demonstrates
the wide geographical scope of his work and the limitations that this places
on the establishment of a ‘Wilkinson Trail’ of sites for interested
enthusiasts. Notional estimates for the value of his works are given and
updated to 2009 values. A separate calculation has been made for the
notional current value of income by area from visitors interested in his
legacy. The latter figure is higher than might be expected after it is
realised that, without the negotiating skills of John Wilkinson, the Iron
Bridge would very probably not have been made of iron.
This summary of the interests of and
benefits accruing from John Wilkinson might form the basis for a more
extensive analysis. It seems unlikely that more sources of original data
will now appear but the work would still be a valuable long-term project. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The author is very grateful for useful
comments and help given by Mark Bramall, Neil Clarke, Steve Dewhirst, John
Freeman, Steve Grenter, Peter King and David Lake. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Aexander, Eric, ‘John Wilkinson’s
Trade Connections’, J. Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc, 30, 2008,
pp34-38. (Broseley Local History Society includes The Wilkinson Society)
Barker, Richard, ‘Iron Ships in Green Fields’, J.
Broseley Local Hist. Soc, 30, 2008, pp20-33.
Barker, Richard (Ed.) ‘Wilkinson Studies’ Merton
Priory Press, Vol. I 1991, 67pp, ISSN 0962-9173, Vol. II, 1992, 100pp, ISBN
0 9520009 0 3,
Bennett, John (ed.), ‘Minera Lead Mines and Quarries’,
Wrexham Maelor Borough Council, 1995, 101pp, ISBN 0 952 55 29 0 6.
Bloy, Marjie, ‘The Speenhamland System’, (1795 poor
law allowance standards),
[http://www.victorianweb.org/history/poorlaw/speen.html]
Braid, D.H.P. ‘Gun Boring from the Solid’ Trans.
Newcomen Soc. 58 (1986) pp. 45-58.
Butler, Janet, ‘John Wilkinson’, PhD thesis,
unpublished draft, Coalbrookdale Library.
Callcut, Vin, ‘John Wilkinson – Copper
King?’, J. Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc, 27, 2005, pp2-28 (http://www.broseley.org.uk/Docs/journal2005.PDF)
and in full at: (http://www.oldcopper.org/john_wilkinson_-_copper_king.htm)
Carlisle, J A & Carlisle, J, ‘John
Wilkinson, Ironmaster’ (http://www.corvedale.previewurl.com/history/john_wilkinson_and_the_snedshill.htm)
Challoner, W. H., ‘The Agricultural Activities of John
Wilkinson, Ironmaster’, British Agricultural History Society, 1957 (5)
Pt 1, (http://www.bahs.org.uk/05n1a4.pdf)
Challon, W. H. ‘John Wilkinson as Note Issuer and Banker’,
Seaby's coin and medal bulletin (Dec. 1948), pp. 550-553
Challon, W. H. ‘New lights on John Wilkinson's token
coinage’, Seaby's coin and medal bulletin (July 1948), p. 306-308.
Challoner, W. H., ‘Dr Joseph Priestly, John Wilkinson and
the French Revolution, 1789-1802’, Trans Royal Hist. Soc. 8,
1958, pp21-40.
Challoner, W. H., ‘The Skilled Artisan 1750-1850’ The
Historical Association, 1969, 16pp.
Clarke, Diana, ‘The Spirit of the Age:
Ideas and Movements of the Eighteenth Century and John Wilkinson’, J
Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc. 24, 2002, pp2-18. (http://www.broseley.org.uk/Newsletters/journal2002-web.PDF)
Clarke, Neil ‘John Wilkinson’s Transport Interests’,
J. Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc, 30, 2008, pp3-14.
Cossons, Neil & Trinder, Barrie, ‘The Iron Bridge’,
Moonraker Press, 1979, 139pp. SBN 239.00187.7.
Cranstone, David, ‘Isaac Wilkinson at Backbarrow’, J.
Historical Metallurgy Soc, 1991, 25, 2, pp87-91.
Dalton, R. & Hamer, S. ‘The Provincial Token Coinage of
the 18th Century’., Allan Davisson's 2004, 566pp.
Davies, Ron, ‘John Wilkinson – Ironmaster Extraordinary’,
2nd Ed., Broseley Local History Society, 26pp. ISBN 0 9504999 5
1.
Davies, Stanley A. ‘Isaac Wilkinson (c. 1705-1784) of
Bersham, Ironmaster and Inventor’, Trans. Newcomen Soc. 27 (1949)
pp69-72.
Dawson, Frank, ‘John Wilkinson, King of the Ironmasters’
Unpublished book, Broseley Local Hist. Soc, 2009, 118pp.
Dawson, Frank, ‘The Significance of the Women in John
Wilkinson’s Life’, J. Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc, 30, 2008, pp39-44.
Dickinson, H. W. ‘Matthew Boulton’, TEE Publishing
1936, reprinted 1999, 218pp. ISBN 85761 112 8.
Dickinson, H. W. and Jenkins, R., ‘James Watt and the
Steam Engine’, First Edition 1927, Second edition 1981, reprinted Encore
Editions 1989, 415pp. ISBN 0-903485-92-3
English Heritage, ‘The Heritage Dividend Methodology:
Measuring the Impacts of Heritage Projects’, c2005, 27pp. http://www.helm.org.uk/upload/pdf/Heritage-Dividend-Methodology.pdf?1243266308
Forward, B A. ‘The Early History of the Cylinder Boring
Machine’ Trans. Newcomen Soc. 5 (1924) pp24-38.
Grenter, Stephen, ‘The Wilkinsons at Bersham’, J
Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc. 30, 2008, pp14-19.
Harris, J R, ‘The British Iron Industry, 1700-1850’,
Palgrave Macmillan, 1988 96pp.
Harris J. R., ‘The Copper King, A Biography of Thomas
Williams of Llanidan’, Liverpool University and University of Toronto
Press, 1964, 194pp
Hayman, Richard & Horton, Wendy, ‘Ironbridge: History and
Guide’. Tempus Publishing, 199, 160pp. ISBN 0 7524 1460 7.
Herfindal, Orris C. ‘Copper Costs and Prices: 1870-1975’,
Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. 1959, 260pp, Library of Congress Cat Card
59-15390.
Hope, Bryan D, ‘A Curious Place, The Industrial History of
Amlwch (1550-1950)’, Watch House Books, Moelfre, 1994, 176pp. ISBN 0
9535268 0 1.
Hughes, Stephen (Ed). ‘Copperopolis – The Landscapes of
the Early Industrial Period in Swansea.’ Royal Commission on the Ancient
and Historical Monuments of Wales’, 2000, revised 2008, 358pp. ISBN
1-871184-32-7.
Ionides, Julia, ‘Thomas Farnolls Pritchard of
Shrewsbury…..’ The Dog Rose Press, 1999, 307pp plus extensive drawing
book. ISBN 0-9528367-1-8.
Lentin, G.L.L., ‘Letters on The Island of Anglesey Copper
Mine and Associated Foundries and Factories’, Siegfried Lebrecht
Crusius, Leipzig, 1800, translated by Rothwell, Nancy, Amlych Industrial
Heritage Trust, 2007.
Mantoux, Paul ‘The Industrial Revolution in the Eighteenth
Century. An Outline of the beginnings of the modern factory system in
England’. Methuen, 1964 528pp. ISBN 0-416-68240-5.
Nelson, Robert L, ‘Price of Bread:
Poverty, Purchasing Power and the Victorian Labourer’s Standard of Living’,
[http://www.victorianweb.org/history/work/nelson1.html]
Pee, Ralph and Hawes, Maurice, ‘John Wilkinson and the Two
Willey Ironworks’, J. Wilkinson Soc. (now incorporated in Broseley Local
History Soc.) 16, 1988.
(http://www.broseley.org.uk/wilkfiles/THE%20TWO%20WILLEY%20IRONWORKS.htm)
Pye, Charles, ‘Provincial Copper Coins or Tokens: Issued
Between the Years 1787 and 1796’ Nicho;s & Egerton, 1797
Randall, John, ‘Broseley and its Surroundings’,
Salopian and West Midland Journal, 1879, 328pp. (available in CD-ROM format
from Broseley Loc. Hist. Soc.).
Randall, John, ‘History of Madeley’, 1880, reprinted
by Salop County Library, 1975, 387pp. ISBN 0 903802 02 3
Randall, John, ‘Our Coal and Iron Industries; the
Wilkinsons’, Randall, 1876, reprinted Barrow News & Mail, 1917, 57pp &
14pp appendix.
Reeve, Robin M. ‘The Industrial Revolution 1750-1850’,
University of London Press 1971, 270pp. ISBN 0 340 07349 7
Riden, Philip, ‘A Gazetteer of Charcoal-fired Blast
Furnaces in Great Britain in use since 1660’, Merton Priory Press, 1987,
1993, 166pp, ISBN ) 9520009 1 1.
Rogers, Cedric, ‘A Collector’s Guide to Minerals Rocks and
Gemstones in Cornwall & Devon’, D. Bradford Barton, Truro, 48pp.
Rogers, D L ‘Shropshire Canals’. Shrewsbury & Newport
Canals Trust, Issue 10, May 2003, [http://www.sncanal.org.uk/10%20-%20May%202003.pdf]
Rolands, John, ‘Copper Mountain’ , Anglesey
Antiquarian Society, Llangefni, 1966, 201pp.
Rowlands, Eryl Wyn, ‘Masts and Shafts, The Story of the
Town and Port of Amlwch 1793-1913’, Millenium Working Party, Amlwch,
2000, 28pp.
Soldon, Herbert C., ‘John Wilkinson (1728–1808) English
Ironmaster and Inventor’ Edwin Mallen Press, New York 1998, 380pp, c170
refs. (ISBN: 0-7734-8268-7)
Schmitz, C. J., ‘World Non-Ferrous Metal Production and
Prices 1700-1976’. Frank Cass 1979 425pp. ISBN 07146 3109 4.
Selgin, George, ‘Good Money: Birmingham Button Makers,
the Royal Mint and the Beginnings of Modern Coinage, 1775-1821’. Independent
Institute, 1957, 2008, 345pp. ISBN-13: 978-0-472-11631-7.
Symons, John, ‘The Copper Mines of Cornwall: Property and
Profit’, CHN Conference 2002, Worcester, summarising the report of the
Parliamentary Committee on the Copper Industry, 1799.
Tann, Jennifer, ‘Boulton and Watt's Organisation of Steam
Engine Production before the opening of Soho Foundry’ Trans. Newcomen
Soc. 49 (1977) pp.41-56
Tann, Jennifer, ‘Riches from Copper: the Adoption of the
Boulton & Watt Engine by Cornish Mine Adventurers’,
Trans Newcomen Soc. 67
(1995), pp.27-52.
Telford & Wrekin
Economic Baseline 2007 ‘Transforming
Telford’
(http://www.telford-development-agency.com/_library/download/www/Files/Telford%20Wrekin%20Economic_Profile_2007.pdf)
Telford & Wrekin Council, ‘Ironbridge
Gorge Management Plan: Section 2 Description and Significance of the World
Heritage Site’ (http://www.telford.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/945FB6AB-DA90-431B-A8EE-225BE18573ED/0/description.pdf)
Trinder, Barrie, ‘The Industrial Revolution in Shropshire’,
Phillimore & Co. Ltd., 1981, 308pp, ISBN 0 85033 428 4.
Turner, Wayne, ‘John Wilkinson’s Trade Tokens’, J.
Wilkinson Soc. 1974, 2, 10-12.
Uglow, Jenny, ‘The Lunar Men’, Faber & Faber, London
2002, 588pp. ISBN 0-571-21610-2.
Webb, Dominic ‘Inflation, the value
of the Pound 1750-2005’ House of Commons Research Paper 06/09,
13/02/06. (http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2006/rp06-009.pdf) |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Bilston, http://www.wolverhamptonarchives.dial.pipex.com/local_industry_3.htm
http://www.southwark.gov.uk/Uploads/FILE_21325.pdf
[safalra.com/other/historical-uk-inflation-price-conversion/]
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|